When studying the world around us, we often draw conclusions based on the results of observations and experiments. General conclusions obtained by examining individual cases are called inductive, and the method of such reasoning is called the inductive method or induction (from Latin inductio — derivation).
For example, long before the discovery of the laws of Earth’s motion, people concluded that the Sun rises in the east in the morning and sets in the west in the evening. This conclusion is inductive: it was based solely on observations.
Of course, induction does not always lead to correct conclusions. Despite the need to treat inductive conclusions with a certain degree of caution, the inductive method finds wide application in mathematics.
Inductive Conjectures
Let us consider two examples.
✎Example — Sum of Odd Numbers
Statement. Let us try to identify a pattern in the sums Sn of the first n odd natural numbers.
The numbers 1, 4, 9, 16, 25 are perfect squares of consecutive natural numbers. We can now make the following conjecture (inductive conclusion): for any natural number n
Sn=n2.
✎Example — The Polynomial f(n) = n² - n + 41
Statement. Consider the values of the polynomial f(n)=n2−n+41 for n=1,2,3,4,5.
One might conjecture that f(n) is prime for every natural number n. However, this conjecture is false: f(41)=412−41+41=412 — a composite number.
ℹNote — Inductive Conclusions
Both conjectures above are merely hypotheses that need to be either proved or disproved. A hypothesis can be disproved by a counterexample, but verifying a finite number of cases can never prove a statement that must hold for infinitely many values.
The Method of Mathematical Induction
The method of proof described below is called mathematical induction. In general terms, it can be described as follows.
Suppose we need to prove that a certain statement is true for every natural number n.
⚡Theorem — The Method of Mathematical Induction
A proof by mathematical induction consists of two parts (theorems):
Base case: Verify that the statement is true for n=1.
Inductive step: Assume the statement is true for n=k, and on this basis prove that it is true for n=k+1.
Both steps are essential. As we saw above, a statement can be true in many individual cases but still be false in general.
ℹNote — Importance of the Base Case
It would be a mistake to consider the base case less important than the inductive step. For instance, using only the inductive step, one could “prove” that for every natural number n, the number 2n+1 is even. Assume this holds for n=k, i.e., 2k+1 is even. Then 2(k+1)+1=(2k+1)+2. The sum of two even numbers is even. We have thus “proved” the inductive step — but the base case fails since 2⋅1+1=3 is odd.
Examples of Proofs
✎Example 1 — Sum of Fractions
Statement. Derive a formula for the sum
1⋅31+3⋅57+…+(2n−1)(2n+1)2n2−1,n∈N.
Solution. For n=1: S1=1⋅31=31.
For n=2: S2=1⋅31+3⋅57=54.
For n=3: S3=79. For n=4: S4=916.
We conjecture that for all n∈N:
Sn=2n+1n2.
We prove this by mathematical induction. The base case n=1 has been verified above.
Assume the formula holds for n=k, i.e., Sk=2k+1k2.
Since (3k−1) is divisible by 2, the entire expression is divisible by 4. Therefore the statement is true.
✎Example 5 — Bernoulli's Inequality
Statement. Prove the inequality (Bernoulli’s inequality):
(1+x)n⩾1+nx,n∈N,x>−1.
Solution. For n=1: 1+x⩾1+x is clearly true.
Assume the inequality holds for n=k: (1+x)k⩾1+kx, k∈N. Since 1+x>0, we have (1+x)k+1⩾(1+kx)(1+x).
Now: (1+kx)(1+x)=1+(k+1)x+kx2⩾1+(k+1)x.
Therefore (1+x)k+1⩾1+(k+1)x.
Both the base case and the inductive step have been established. The inequality is proved.
Induction with a Different Base Value and Step
Mathematical induction is also used when a statement needs to be proved for all natural numbers n⩾n0, where n0∈N, n0>1. In this case, the base case is verified for n=n0.
It is also possible to use induction with step 2: the base case verifies the statement for both n=1 and n=2, and the inductive step proves that if the statement holds for n=k, it also holds for n=k+2.
✏Exercise — Prove by Mathematical Induction
Prove that for any natural number n: 12+22+32+…+n2=6n(n+1)(2n+1).
Prove the inequality 2n>2n+1 for n∈N, n⩾3.
Prove that for any natural number n, the expression (5n−3n+2n) is divisible by 4.